- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. clpo13(talk) 21:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Naijapadis[edit]
- Naijapadis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable online entertainment website with Alexa rank of almost 9m. Was previously deleted under CSD from me but the author restored page, and contested a WP:PROD from another editor Fram (talk) Running a full AfD to resolve as the page may need salting. Britishfinance (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my reasoning at the Proposed Deletion. No evidence of notability at all. Fram (talk) 08:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no indication of significance, and no the subject of enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NCORP.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Very unreliable references of social media sites, not notable at all. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non notable and don't have enough coverage. Reddragon7 (talk) 04:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.