The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nagar Valley[edit]

Nagar Valley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be merged with Nagar(princely state) or the Hunza-Nagar District articles. 3 articles on the same topic seems quite too much TheOriginalSoni (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It is not synonymous with the district or state. There are enough references and information[1][2] to satisfy WP:GEOLAND and even a bit of news ("Kohistan massacre: Elders of Shia-domina­ted Nagar valley protec­t 35 Sunni labour­ers"). Clarityfiend (talk) 03:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The three articles named (Nagar (princely state), Hunza-Nagar District, and Nagar Valley) are disorganized and overlapping, but they are about three distinct concepts: the former political entity, the current administrative division, and the physical feature. Nagar Valley should be pared down to geographical content. The Interior (Talk) 08:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.