The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 17:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nabil A Rastani[edit]

Nabil A Rastani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that he meets our criteria at WP:People. Dougweller (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Doesn't pass by the notability requirements. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't delete It has various sources and references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Butcher123hi (talk • contribs) 18:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC) — Butcher123hi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• I would'nt delete It, it seems to have enough sources as Butcher suggested.Abdullahtheperson (talk)— Abdullahtheperson (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Comment - Note, the above editor has one edit, and it's commenting on this AFD. Note that policy is about multiple secondary reliable sources that note why the person is not notable, and not just any source. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 00:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No notability apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 13:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. Contributing some articles to a webpage is, unfortunately, not the type of of scholarly output needed to demonstrate notability. Agricola44 (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete: per nom. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 05:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, I've haven't any reliable sources except the ones subject has provided. SwisterTwister (talk) 06:08, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.