The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete. (non-admin closure) ToThAc (talk) 19:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mustelodon[edit]

Mustelodon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a hoax per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Palaeontology#Mustelodon, the supposed type locality of "Lago Nandarajo" has no hits other than this article and mirrors. There are no other hits for the genus aside from a 2019 book which is presumably copying from Wikipedia. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Nothing in Google Scholar. Nothing in Biodiversity Heritage Library. Hoax appears likely. Enwebb (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and add to WP:HOAXLIST. gobonobo ^{+ c} 23:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, in 2008 this article was prodded, but it was declined. gobonobo ^{+ c} 12:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for reasons above and add to hoaxlist. Geekgecko (talk) 01:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No mentions of it in sources. Add to hoaxlist. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 05:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per G3 as a blatant hoax. I believe this is the longest lasting-hoax yet, clocking in at 14 years and 9 months. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per above. -TheseusHeLl (talk) 16:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -as noted by others, this is a fake genus and should be removed.--Kevmin § 18:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The description also seems to be a joke, hoax article. PainProf (talk) 03:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per all above and per the nom. Clone commando sev (talk) 23:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.