The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiliteracies[edit]

Multiliteracies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Neologism - Although I find quite a few occurrences of the word on Google, it should be remembered that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. LittleOldMe 16:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Extreme delete - this isn't even a dicdef as it doesn't actually define the word anywhere. Not worth transwikiing - Wiktionary would turn their nose up and send it back - iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Definition that does not define. Useless. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 20:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.