The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2004 Palm Island death in custody. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mulrunji[edit]

WP:ONEEVENT and WP:NOTNEWS. The subject of this biographical article was involved in a series of unfortunate but newsworthy events that generated a fair bit of news coverage. However, he is still only notable for one event (his untimely death). Subsequent events following on from this are already well covered at 2004 Palm Island death in custody, leaving this obituary-style and not particularly neutral article redundant and unnecessary. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2004 Palm Island death in custody per nom and in line with the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Hurley. Nick-D (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Lankiveil and Nick. --Step hen 10:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2004 Palm Island death in custody. Insufficient notability to stand as a biographical article. WWGB (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nomination and per Nick-D. The incident is tragic and should be remembered, but Wikipedia should cover the event and not the person. The article on the subsequent riots covers the event adequately. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 08:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.