- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Muhammad Naqib-ur-Rahman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure the current sourcing is reliable. All seem to reference the same speech by this individual, and all could be called into question regarding their neutrality. Searches turned up zero other references, even using the alternative spellings of his name. Onel5969 TT me 21:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- What makes you think that the sources reference the same speech? One is from 2013, and the two from about a month apart from 2016 are about Saudi Arabia and Pakistan respectively, completely separate topics. And which of those well-established national newspapers do you think would not be neutral with regard to this subject? As far as I am aware none of them is aligned with Sufism, the topic with which this subject is associated. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Here are alternate names:
- Unscintillating (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It seems he has been the subject of news stories over at least a three year period and across different domains (in terms of subject of the story and country the story takes place), so I think that well satisfies GNG. Smmurphy(Talk) 03:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nothing satisfying our notability for this subject and the information cited gives nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.