The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
While this is a real place, I don't see what makes it notable. Plus, it's just one long paragraph that isn't correct in it's grammar. I like Astatine (Talk to me) 15:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP The above article is much improved now. Unsourced content and 'original research' has been removed by me. It's not a long pargraph any more. Meets WP:GEOLAND which states, "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable". Also meets WP:NPLACE which states, "Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as their existence is verified through a reliable source". This article already has an archived reliable source by the National Reconstruction Bureau, Government of Pakistan website....Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.