The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mpalanga[edit]

Mpalanga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ward that fails WP:GNG. Wikicology (talk) 08:25, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Per WP:GEOLAND: "Populated, legally-recognized places are typically considered notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can remain notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. One exception is that census tracts are usually not considered notable." - Takeaway (talk) 15:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Recognised country sub-division. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:GEOLAND. I am One of Many (talk) 07:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.