The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Appleyard (talk • contribs)

There was an edit conflict in closing this nomination after I speedily deleted the article. I was going to clarify the deletion by saying that although an article cannot be speedily deleted as a hoax, given that the editor's sole other contribution was vandalism, I'm going to treat this in the same way. Pretty well done for vandalism, though. (CSD G3) -- RG ² 10:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mows[edit]

Hoax surely? -- RHaworth 07:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obviously. Someguy1221 07:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As an obvious hoax. You don't need to be familiar with Genetic engineering to know that this is a hoax (subatomic level of comparison? come on). Even without that glaring point, there are no google hits to support its existence. --Lenticel ^(talk) 08:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Exterminate using a better mows-trap. Too bad try-outs for BJAODN are over this week; don't miss Image:MowDNA.png, you only get this one chance. --Dhartung | Talk 08:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. The Russian form Косить that he included, means "to mow" as mowing a lawn. Anthony Appleyard 09:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems to come from this Eager Contributor 09:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as patent nonsense. So tagged. Zetawoof_(ζ) 09:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.