The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of♥♦♣♠ 02:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete OR, NPOV, orphaned, and just plain useless. Plus, aren't the items in it covered already elswhere? Whsitchy 14:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Original Research. ~ SEEnoEVILpunch the keys 06:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of♥♦♣♠ 02:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.