The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be userfied on request by users without a conflict of interest. Sandstein 09:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mountainviews[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this website is notable. Although the secondary sources use it as a source, they aren't about the site. I had originally tagged this for prod, and have removed the tag because the page creator is opposed to deletion. They have made their comments at talk:Mountainviews. Agtx (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 12:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 19:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and draft/userfy as my searches found nothing particularly good to improve sourcing and notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.