The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, a household name in the UK. Poor article, but unquestionably notable. Guy (Help!) 22:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mothercare[edit]

Mothercare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

it could be notable, but I did not see multiple non-trivial references which say so MsHyde 22:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep Could not possibly be more notable. I'll add some references. CiaranG 22:22, 6 February 2007(UTC)
• Speedy keep One of the most well-known stores in the UK. --Folantin 22:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep - You must, surely, be joking? Turnover of £483m in 2006, 391 stores (inc. 18 in Russia and 10 in India), listed on the London Stock Exchange, 5255 employees and still non-notable? Listing this for deletion without at least basic fact-checking is bordering on disruption. --YFB ¿ 22:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Here is good reference--http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,20089-2054547,00.html. But you cannot find by seraching for Mothercare, only Mothercare and UK. I will agree with speedy keep, but the article is very poor, reads like an ad, and has no good references.-MsHyde 22:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, how about fixing it, rather than going on a prod/AfD spree? --YFB ¿ 22:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.