The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Motek Productions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for an agency of questionable notability. The article provides a lot of references, but very few of them actually mention the agency itself, except for references from primary sources. A Google news search on "Motek Productions" shows zero results. A standard search shows a plethora of primary sources and social media sites run by the company, but no significant coverage from independent reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete- not notable--Shrike (talk) 14:55, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sorry but myspace, youtube, flickr and LinkedIn are not WP:RS that establish this company's notability. --Artene50 (talk) 23:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is one article listed in the references devoted to the actual company. It's from Ynet and in Hebrew (Google translation). There also appears to be separate WP article on Motek's non-profit spin-off, Motek Cultural Initiative. That likewise has one article to devoted to it from the The Jewish Tribune [1]. However, we don't need two separate articles devoted to this company. It may be possible to merge them into one article, if the consensus is that the YNET and Jewish Tribune articles are enough to pass WP:GNG. The remaining sources in both articles are trivial mentions, mainly who to contact for tickets. Voceditenore (talk) 13:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This article is about an Impresario, not a music organization. Is it a notable one? Two articles definitely not warranted, though I'm not sure if even one is either yet, maybe in a few years. The vast majority of sources are merely articles the concerts and not about Motek. I'd appreciate to see 'otherstuff' of similar impressarios/organizations that might change my mind in the other direction. --Shuki (talk) 22:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I too am smelling an advertisement. --Bachrach44 (talk) 13:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —Hue Sat Lum 17:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.