The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Moscow Technological Institute#Moscow Business School. czar 08:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow Business School[edit]

Moscow Business School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising, promotion. Deleted 6 times in Ru.wikipedia.org Mitte27 (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep Passing WP:SCH is enough to save the article from deletion, since the school has a notable alumni that developed Numbuster. Final words: The article need a complete rewrite and more reliable sources should be cited by a willing editor who is familiar with the article. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eh ... WP:SCH is a failed proposal. Also, notability isn't inherited so reasoning that the school where the developer of a well-known app attended makes the school itself notable is bogus. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Appears to be pretty notable and no good rationale given for deletion now the promotional material has been removed (which the nominator could have done themselves). -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment "Appears to be pretty notable" is a strange reason to !vote Keep given that the article has exactly one reference - which is to its own website. What other indications are there (supported obviously be references) that this organization is notable? HighKing⁺⁺ 13:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• DeleteRedirect as per AllyD below. I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. To meet the requirements for notability, there must be multiple references that meet the above requirements. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to the parent Moscow Technological Institute article which itself has a brief section about this School (though it is itself a poorly-written, unreferenced article). I am not seeing evidence that this particular school has the individual notability which could meet Wikipedia:College_and_university_article_guidelines#Faculties_and_academic_colleges . AllyD (talk) 13:21, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.