The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh 00:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moonpod[edit]

Moonpod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article was originally speedy deleted under A7. The deleting admin reversed himself at DRV, but there remain concerns regarding notability and lack of independent sources. Delete, pending reliable sources and other comments. Xoloz 15:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see no significant reason to delete this article. Both published games by Moonpod have Wikipedia pages that warrant notability within the independent gaming community. The awards that those games have received are from established publications/websites. The fan base for both published games are current, significant & substantial. -75.130.90.56 16:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)-[reply]

• Keep Seems to be about as notable as an indie developer can be. See, for instance, [1]. Rl 18:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Games from that developer meet notability requirements (e.g. Mr._Robot and Starscape). This in turn causes the developer to become at least as notable. Going with a delete would impact these other articles, and there's already a request to improve the assertion of notability. --Sigma 7 05:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Sigma 7's rationale. --Aarktica 14:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.