The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks more like self-promotion than an attempt at creating an article backed up by third-party sources.--DrumstickJuggler (talk) 03:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probably Delete per nom. I also tried to find independent verification earlier and wasn't able to come up with much. Additionally, the article was tagged for speedy deletion when it was created ([1]) but when the creator deleted the tag nothing further was done. squibix(talk) 15:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.