The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Monax

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The usual plethora of PR, company announcements, mentions-in-passing when discussing blockchain or hyperledger, interviews, churnalism that relies entirely on quotations and information provided by the company. Not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability as per WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I checked the sources and all I could find was superficial propping up. The Reuters source doesn't even mention Monax. --Ysangkok (talk) 17:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is no evidence that the company is notable and this just comes across as a PR piece. Dunarc (talk) 20:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.