The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 20:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable unless someone can come up with secondary sources. —BradV 15:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is a lack of independent sources to assert importance. --Stormbay (talk) 02:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.