The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that Mitch Malloy is notable; the article is not a copyright violation, but rather was copied by several websites which mirror Wikipedia content. John254 02:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch Malloy[edit]

Mitch Malloy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable, was not an official recognized member of the band according to the official band or label website, never participated in an official recording, the article is poorly sourced; one source listed is an online fan site interview with the person in question Eatabullet (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I think I got a good ref in there now. GtstrickyTalk or C 17:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the link to answers.com because the only mention of him is in their copy of our Van Halen article. DCEdwards1966 19:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like I keep getting Rick Rolled. Every article on the Van Halen relationship is a WP mirror. Anyway... I can not find any sources that backup the Van Halen claim. He is notable on his own but the article should be rewritten with info on him and his career and the Van Halen info deleted. GtstrickyTalk or C 19:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.