The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (WP:A3) by User:R'n'B. (non-admin closure) I'm splitting the 2 years apart into 2 different AfDs, due to the speedy of 2013. CTJF83 chat 05:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2013[edit]

Miss Universe 2013 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PRODded this last night - saying that "Wp:TIND - 2010 is way too early to have a page for 2013's contest." An anon user came along and removed the PROD, so here it comes. I should probably have put Wp:CRYSTAL in the PROD as well. (I'm guessing that, because the reference given says, "NBC has renewed its exclusive agreement… to broadcast the "Miss Universe" and "Miss USA" pageants on the network for three additional years effective in 2011").

I am including the following for the same reason (although someone else PRODded it - stating "Per Wp:CRYSTAL - but that was contested as well):

Miss Universe 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 14:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Miss Universe 2013: speedy delete, WP:A3.
2. Miss Universe 2012: delete, WP:CRYSTAL. Little can be said about the event that is verifiable and not original research. See [1], [2]. — Rankiri (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.