The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:52, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miniminter (YouTuber)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent coverage in reliable sources indicating notability. Googling them brings up plenty of results, but they just seem to be their social media postings or other similar entries. Having 5 million subscribers seems to be enough of a claim to avoid speedy deletion, but reliable sources are still needed. 331dot (talk) 15:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Kellymoat (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but cleanup passes WP:GNG and WP:ENT, per these sources [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. [10] AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AlessandroTiandelli333: The first two links do not work (for the sake of discussion they do now.) AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC) , and the others seem to be about a group they are involved with or associated with, and mention this person little if at all. If they are associated with a group, then this article could be merged with that of the group. 331dot (talk) 15:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should do now, I think having a following as large as that should confer notability per WP:ENT on point #2 though. (Sometimes they just refer to him as Simon not miniminter.) AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've said that a large following may confer notability, but the sources from what I see don't indicate how this person is notable as an individual, just as part of a group. If it is the group that is notable, then this should be part of an article on the group. 331dot (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that, @331dot, but one doesn't exist at the moment (only a brief mention at KSI (entertainer), it does mention this person as a original member). AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 15:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. Sorry, but asides from his affiliation to the group, Simon has no independent sources outlining his authority or notability in the trade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.249.112 (talk) 03:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm not finding strong enough secondary sources on this YouTuber. At best this link from MCVUK and that's not much. GamerPro64 04:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - and possibly salt as this is going on the 5th or more creation at this point. They lacked the notability in 2015, 2016 and still lack the notability now. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Minter (miniminter), Miniminter Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.