The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 21:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miming[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable mythical figure - probably a nonsense joke that has been on Wikipedia for 13 years. Curro2 (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is easy to verify this topic. Please see the search links above and WP:BEFORE. Andrew D. (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a single legitimate (predating this Wikipedia page) source for this. Curro2 (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – @Curro2: This is definitely not a hoax, and is verifiable. Source examples include: ^[1], ^[2], ^[3], ^[4], ^[5]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Snow Keep. Clearly notable, verifiable, and the nom has no rational basis for deletion. Lithorien (talk) 15:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep - Perhaps even a speedy keep. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep' obviously. The mythological importance of this character is amply demonstrated by the sources provided by North America, and I found a bunch more through a very quick search. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Easy to find online with a quick search. JTtheOG (talk) 05:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.