The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neil (►) 11:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Schwarz[edit]

Not notable and lacking reliable sources. My perusal of Google search and news results didnt turn up any notable achievements by this person. John Vandenberg 03:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question He is called a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional, and I find from the Q&A on that : Q3: How does Microsoft select its MVPs? A3: Over 100 million people participate in technical communities but there are only about 3,500 MVPs worldwide (a year). I sugest that's quite a large group and not sufficiently selective. Are there better objective criteria? DGG 01:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete He was interviewed on a website and coauthored some books. If notable, then on the low side of notability. nadav (talk) 05:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete All the references do not amount to anything. Sounds like self-promotion. Stellatomailing 22:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.