The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Tyrenius 08:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metapainting[edit]

Metapainting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is biased on the basis of scope. The article describes an unremarkable group of individuals with fake bibliographic references to certify their importance. The individuals calling themselves the metapainters do exist, but the term "metapainting" not only inaccurately describes their practices, but was also coined for the purposes of a single exhibition. Sterfry 18:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nonverifiable, neologism, made up in one day, and unsourced garbage. Bearian 20:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.