The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Likely a hoax.Anonimu (talk) 23:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - MelodyVision appears to exist as some kind of fan created spin-off of Eurovision on YouTube [1][2] and gets a mention on blog at the EBU's site. [3]. The article content bars some relation to this website [4] though it appears to be fantasy based and the current articles seem to be written in an in-universe style. In any case all the sources I have found are non-reliable/user created so the article wouldn't pass WP:V / WP:RS / WP:N. The article creator seems determined to stop this AfD, though he does not seem to be a strong speaker of English and is rather young hence perhaps why he is making strange edits such as this [5]. Camaron · Christopher ·talk 11:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete According to the EBU which runs the Eurovision Song Contest, MelodyVision is an "online world song contest" [6]. My impression is that it is just some random person's idea for a contest and people vote for which previously released songs are to represent which countries via an online vote, while the actual singers probably have no idea and no stake in the contest whatsoever. Not a hoax, just not notable. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax. As online contest, there are hundreds of those run by ESC fans and none of them are notable, but the article is obviously giving fake information, stating the organizing cities etc i.e. pretending the contest to be real one. Also, Eurovision Family blogs are not associated with EBU, it is purely fan made content. Anyone can create a blog there and write whatever he wants.AlexeyU (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.