The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:28, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meg Pokrass[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has exactly zero independent references. I've searched and I am unable to find any. There's a cite to her publisher, and then to various blogs and low circulation magazines that she has written for. This article fails the general notability guideline and should be deleted. She also does not meet any of the criteria in WP:AUTHOR. MrOllie (talk) 20:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that this article has been speedily deleted five times (at this title and at Meg A. Pokrass, so salting may be appropriate. - MrOllie (talk) 15:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. Writing and being published is not an automatic ticket to notability. She does not appear to meet any of the criteria of WP:AUTHOR such as winning a major prize or being written ABOUT by other people. Name-dropping notable people in the article does not contribute to her own notability. --MelanieN (talk) 21:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.