The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable historical reenactment group, only 23 Ghits, none of them significant coverage. Masaruemoto 03:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to [List of historical reenactment groups]] may be worth a single line there. - Peripitus(Talk) 06:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete or redirect as above. I see a sliver of notability here, especially the claim of having appeared on Red Dwarf, but of course that isn't backed up by reliable sources, indeed nor is anything else here. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qst 17:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Tony. There are only 21 Ghits excluding Wikipedia itself. jj137 (Talk) 19:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.