The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete under A7. Hut 8.5 21:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maygas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable organisation. Promotional context. Unsourced _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:31, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a possible hoax; the only reference is their website, which doesn't claim to be a business. Google search shows multiple unrelated businesses of the same name. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An unsourced article making no claim to notability, even self-deprecating in tone. Nothing here to meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG, not even enough in my opinion to exceed a CSD A7. AllyD (talk) 06:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.