The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability not established. This is probably a vanity article. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be non-notability, because the article doesn't say why he is. ~ DC (Talk|Edits) 15:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: There is no credible assertion of notability made about this person. No need for an AFD discussion. Locke9k (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - no indication of notability that I can see... Cocytus[»talk«] 05:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.