The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Bursa[edit]

Non-notable cricket player who neither meets WP:ATHLETE or WP:CRIN. While the subject has had some press coverage in local newspapers, he has not played at a fully professional level nor has he played first-class cricket. Mattinbgn\^talk 03:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 03:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. —Mattinbgn\^talk 03:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. He is only 20, so still plenty of time to become notable. WWGB (talk) 03:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn per appropriate guidelines. Fails WP:CRIN.--Sting Buzz Me... 03:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete From an examination of their results, he's played infrequently at district level for Blacktown's firsts - he's played most recently for their second team - so he appears several rungs short of reaching the required status. Murtoa (talk) 04:32, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Jonesy (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.