- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete no reason to relist. A redirect can be created at editorial discretion. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Material information[edit]
- Material information (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dictionary definition that appears to be have been created as spam for Ansarada's software product. Pontificalibus (talk) 16:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 18:44, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 18:44, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As the nom suggests, this is a WP:COATRACK article for a software product. It's not a term of art that has any real meaning separate from materiality (law). I guess a redirect could be appropriate, but I don't feel strongly one way or the other. I should add that I deleted the spammy part of the article, but it's still available here if anyone wants to see it. agtx 05:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - although technically a valid legal definition, this is a WP:DICTDEF and therefore fails WP:NOT. Dysklyver 09:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Materiality (law). Same thing. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 00:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: To discuss TimTempleton's ATD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 (c · m) 05:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.