The result was delete, with particular weight given to the argument of lack of sourcing, as no sources have been added since the prior no-consensus AfD where verifiability played a major part in the argument. krimpet⟲ 00:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first AfD, two years ago, had a result of keep, and the second, ten months ago, resulted in no consensus. I think the phrase "Wikipedia is not a dictionary" applies here. Some of the glossaries we have in Wikipedia are encyclopedic, having detailed discussions of terms and their relationships to each other, but this is nothing more than a list of definitions. Powers T 12:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]