The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I am open to userfying the article upon request. --MelanieN (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin Baumgartner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was that he Hasn't received significant coverage nor played in a fully pro league match. Therefore the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD was contested procedurally as the article had previously been deleted by PROD. The delete rationale remains valid nonetheless. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I didn't even know the article had already been deleted by PROD. Anyway unless something happens over the weekend, the article still fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. – Michael (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if something may happen within a couple of days, then perhaps this shouldn't have been nominated, and a bit of WP:COMMONSENSE applied to wait it out ... or simply move the article to Draft Space. Nfitz (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Not keen on moving to draftspace as I do not think we want to encourage an environment whereby people can freely create as many articles on non-notable players they like and keep them in draft in perpetuity. Draftspace should be used for drafting articles on already notable subjects, not as a holding pen in anticipation of notability which might never come. Fenix down (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:58, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG - [1]. He could very likely get a fully professional start before the weekend is out, making this nomination a complete and total waste of everyone's time - we need to start following WP:COMMONSENSE when nomininating fully professional players hours before the season starts. Nfitz (talk) 19:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Cavarrone 22:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. JMHamo (talk) 14:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.