The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources, no relevant non-Wikipedia Google hits: Content is unverifiable, topic probably non-notable. Article was prodded for those concerns, but the only source added when the prod was removed was a primary source, probably not reliable, that cannot bestow notability. Huon (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, I have tried my best to address your concerns because I also believe in authenticity of an article for the viewers. I appreciate your concern that the name "Shah e Najaf" refers to various other religious centres, but I should be encouraged that, I brought up this Shah e Najaf on wikipedia along with its entire information of where it exists. No disambiguation will occur because this place is Central place whereas other articles, if published, will have to use specific titles in future. I have clearly mentioned its existence in the main city of Hyderabad, Sindh. I have mentioned Shah e Najaf as "Markazi Imambargah" which means central Imambargah in the city of Hyderabad, Sindh and as well as Pakistan. Therefore it is requested to remove the tag for deletion from this article. Thanks.--Shahenshahkillz (talk) 07:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]