The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 03:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Friedman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is basically an PR biography. It starts by saying he is the author of a book. the book is self-published. I checked the sources. They include some churnalism (e.g. the Guardian source) and others where he is not even namechecked. He is a director of a couple of think-tanks. They too are non-notable and we have no articles on them - unsurprising since he started both himself. Thus, all the cited works in the bibliography, specifically including the one for which he is supposedly known, are self-published. In the end, I think this fails the test of independent coverage per WP:GNG, and also fails the significance test for authors or academics. Guy (Help!) 19:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's classic WP:VSCA. JzG is dead-on in spotting the Guardian article as just being churnalism. Sources 4 and 5 are dead for me, but they look unlikely to actually name this person, let alone discuss him in any detail. The article in Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice is a little more, though it arguably tends more towards a finding of notability for the concept of results-based accountability. But we're not discussing that subject here, we're discussing Friedman, who would appear to fail all relevant notability guidelines. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.
I just fix three bad incoming links, from

Danielle Reed ‎ [1]

List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 2008 ‎ [2]

Turtle Power: The Definitive History of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles ‎[3]

all accidental wikilink errors intending someone with the same or similar name. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.