The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. Waggers (talk) 10:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Chiarello[edit]

This article has been unreferenced for more than six months and is a BLP problem. The subject has won a few awards and has some publications, but nobody has bothered to provide references substantiating anything in the article. As such, the article remains a WP:BLP problem and should be deleted.

Further, two WikiProjects claimed this article, one about 18 months ago and the other about 14 months ago. Neither seems to have improved the article, and neither has assesed the article.

Prod was removed by User:DGG on 24 November, 2007 saying that one of the awards was cited, even though it wasn't (and still isn't, about three weeks later). Mikeblas (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The NCS award is sort of indirectly sourced, in that you can click on the link to National Cartoonists Society page and follow the links to this. Zagalejo^^^ 01:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as sourceable. The tag changed to verify. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 03:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--ZeWrestler ^Talk 05:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- Hiding T 22:06, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. What's the issue with BLP? Hiding T 22:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.