The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marieta Besu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither delivering an interview to one's local paper nor having one's paintings exposed in one's city of residence (what the references indicate) is substantive evidence of notability. I can't see any of the WP:PROF or WP:ARTIST criteria being met. And indeed, none of the long list of achievements seems to merit inclusion, but before someone says one of them does, I'd like to note they too are unreferenced, so we have no evidence that she can actually lay claim to all but three of these (the footnoted ones). - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:52, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable under any guidelines, personal CV. Dahn (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 06:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 22:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I trimmed down all the cv-like cruft from the article so I could see what was actually there. There does seem to be a little coverage of her in reliable media, but most of it is announcements of exhibitions in her local newspaper. I'm having a hard time justifying the broader coverage in reliable sources that would pass WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. And while she claims some major art show and museum exposure, again there doesn't seem to be much coverage of it that we could use as the basis of an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.