- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nthep (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Manjekia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very Sloppy and unorganized. Has no real sources TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 17:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is absolutely ridiculous. I started the article less than 30 minutes ago, and I'm adding sources...which apparently you didn't bother to check.
I suggest that this AFD be closed as "premature" and the article tagged as a "stub".
Fact: genus-level differentation is generally accepted as reasonable to have an own article. This genus has been around for FOUR years and no one at Wikipedia has noticed. You should be looking to build on the new-found knowledge, not trying to tear it down before its even properly developed.Ryoung122 17:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep The nominator, whose account is only a month old, appears unfamiliar with the justifications for nominating an article for deletion. Neither a need for copyediting nor (except in the case of a living person) a lack of references is grounds for deletion. Please read Wikipedia:New pages patrol for information on reviewing new pages, and become familiar with Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Deletion policy and, in particular, the due diligence you should apply before nominating an article for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It appears to be a notable topic of encyclopedic value and the article creator has stated he is still working on it.SeraphWiki (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not grounds for deletion of the article, and it's clearly a notable topic. Really, all it needs is some of the references moved inline. Anaxial (talk) 18:56, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep of course. Perfectly notable topic. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.