The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. On a solid academic career track but as Xxanthippe says too early to have demonstrated sufficient impact for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like quite a few papers done while a PhD candidate, Still too early as per Xxanthippe, but I wouldn't doubt to see him eventually meet the requirements. Bgwhite (talk) 05:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Subject is not a full professor but has quite a number of papers in peer-reviewed journals and is also a co-holder of several patents for Radio-frequency identification systems. Yoninah (talk) 15:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, too early does not pass WP:PROF yet. Nsk92 (talk) 12:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO at the moment, but is a good candidate for an article in the future. Grand total of 272 citations on GS, and an h-index of 8 at the moment, with about 27 new cites per year. Article was created too early.--Eric Yurken (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of notable mentions. I didn't see anything that would be bigraphically helpful on both Yahoo! and Google aside from contact information on .edu webpages. SwisterTwistertalk 22:46, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.