The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magnus Ueland[edit]

Magnus Ueland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod. Unreferenced BLP. Plays on the second tier in Norway, Norwegian First Division. That is not a fully professional league. Fails WP:ATHLETE and there are no other significant coverage that fulfills WP:BIO#basic criteria. Rettetast (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Nom seems to have gotten it all. Delete. Quantumobserver (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete OK thanks for the explanation guys. I had absolutely no idea that this wasn't a fully professional league. Division One and Two in English football are professional and are notable teams and players. Thanks for clearing it up. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Punkmorten (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; non-notable player. GiantSnowman 14:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Has extensive media coverage [1] and thus meets WP:N which trumps WP:ATHLETE. Nfitz (talk) 03:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, that's not media coverage, thats called a Google search - and not even of the person this AfD relates to. --Jimbo^[online] 10:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oops cut and paste typo ... fixed. Search was of media articles only. Nfitz (talk) 03:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • But were any of them actually about his playing exploits or just trivial name-checks. --Jimbo^[online] 08:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Yes, the top two for instance are in-depth articles about the individual player, in one of the three largest newspapers. Lampman (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • The first article is about the player being on a trial in another first division club, the second article is about him being injured when coming back to Bryne to play against his old team. Both articles origins from te local newspaper Stavanger Aftenblad, but are also published in Aftenposten because of the collaborative effort 100 % fotball. Rettetast (talk) 11:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Professional player with extensive media coverage. Lampman (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete coverage is trivial, not notable enough to meet WP:N. Fails WP:ATHLETE too. --Jimbo^[online] 11:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:ATHLETE and WP:N failure. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.