The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MacKenzieHeartsu[edit]

Insufficient sources. Sources are all flaky or PR Newswire. Includes a huge chunk of OR tagged since 9/07 with nothing fixed, a search for better sources turned up nothing. YTMND is the second hit. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful delete, as article creator. Anything important here can be merged back into List of Internet phenomena or viral marketing. One-off ad campaign that really isn't remembered anymore (still, though, someone's got to write this down when it happens). Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - is an advertising campaign notable? Especially one I never heard of?! Bigger digger (talk) 14:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Karanacs (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.