The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is no discussion or coverage of the MacOnLinux software in third-party independent sources that establish notability via the general notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. The additional guidelines for software do not provide a reason to keep. Consensus is to delete. Malinaccier (talk) 21:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mac-on-Linux[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly non-notable software article, no reliable sources, I could only find a few passing mentions on a Gbook search, but no independent reviews. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable secondary coverage. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no claim of notability made within the article and lacking secondary sources. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.