The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MUX (The Hardy Boys)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional topic, no outside sources. Reywas92^Talk 19:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I could find literally zero sources regarding this completely non-notable fictional company, outside of mirrors of this article. Even the Hardy Boys wiki doesn't have an entry for this entity. This is exactly the kind of article that the PROD system was created for, so we don't have waste time on an AFD, so its a bit ridiculous that the PROD was contested (and with no explanation why, at that). Rorshacma (talk) 23:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Minor WP:PLOT element that completely fails WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Definition of fancruft. Deproded by User:Andrew Davidson with unhelpful technical summary. Andrew, can you tell us why you think this topic deserves its own article? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.,Article is not sourced, does not meet notability. Alex-h (talk) 11:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.