The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I appreciate Cullen328's erring on the side of assuming Greek sources are acceptable, but it was challenged by a Greek editor, and no further comments were made. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MEDASSET[edit]

MEDASSET (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article on an organization that gets only incidental coverage (there's a mention on CNN somewhere). Not notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 14:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  12:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.