The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia#National headquarters and staff. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrecrest[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable. Some random house, with no sources cited nor forthcoming from a Google search. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, back to National headquarters and staff section within the Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia national fraternity article. The content of this article is way too much, not encyclopedic at all, and no notability of Lyrecrest itself is established. It includes recounting of national headquarters locations of the fraternity, which seems not encyclopedic. A small part of its contents could be edited down and merged into the "National headquarters and staff" section, but most should simply be dropped. There is no encyclopedic purpose for naming staffpersons who worked there. The building is not of architectural or historical note, and a picture of it appears in the national headquarters section already. The national headquarters section should be kept about as short as it is now, dropping other info there now in order to add any bits from this article. But, "redirect" is preferred to "delete", for tracking contributions, and for the unlikely possibility that Lyrecrest becomes wikipedia-notable in the future. I would not mind having the redirect protected to prevent re-creation by too-enthusiastic P M U S ers, with explanation left at its Talk page. --do ncr am 00:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Good afternoon (talk) 13:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.