The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Love Kiss Music[edit]

Yesterday I wikified this artile and removed advertising and POV text. But now I come to think that this article might not be notable, as there is no reason given about the achievements and importance of this label. It is more about its "star" Lugo, of whom I also cannot find any independent sources on his notability. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Any chance of secondary sources for the label?Ottawa4ever (talk) 18:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:COMPANY. Google News, Google Web show no signs of significant coverage by reliable sources. — Rankiri (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Rankiri. Iowateen (talk) 05:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails notability per WP:CORP. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 13:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.