The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lou Guzzo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still questionable for all applicable notability and I have found only expected mentions at News, Books and Highbeam, nothing noticeably convincing. SwisterTwister talk 23:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Scholar also shows some widely-cited works. GNG is met, and this gentleman's career was almost entirely before the advent of the Internet, so I'm not to worried about it "barely" making it, per WP:NTEMP, he needn't have ongoing coverage to remain notable after his death. Jclemens (talk) 06:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.