The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Longecity[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It appears to me that this organization fails WP:ORG. I do not see the requisite third-party sourcing available that would enable us to be able to write a neutral article on this subject. All of the sourcing is either directly connected to the organization or is part of the walled garden of "life-extension" advocates. jps (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the article fails to establish notability by reference to reliable independent sources. Also it sucks. Guy (Help!) 12:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cannot seem to find the name of the organization in the only reference that seems like it might be a WP:RS ([1] asserted to be on pg 48 but not found) Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was unable to find any mention of this organization in reliable mainstream sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent sources that I can find, it's sourced in what looks like a cluster of cross-referencing organizations of dubious reliability and no independence. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.