The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 14:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LondonSays[edit]

LondonSays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

NN "think tank" fails notability guidelines for organizations. The few Google hits I get are blog entries. Prod removed by an IP. - IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 18:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Nuetral This article does meet Wikipedia's criteria, but I do feel a little weak about it. It may fail WP:NOTE.--RyRy5 talk 18:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep Seems like a fairly recent and unknown organisation, however it's backed by a few high notability individuals in London. Cambrasa (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Lacks reliable independant sourcing to verify notability. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No reliable sources. Very few Google results, no Google news results. -Icewedge (talk) 01:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.